Ecological Applications
2016
26
4
1098–1111
https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0935
1051-0761 (impreso), 1939-5582 (electrónico)
biodiversity co-benefit; camera trapping; carbon stocks; conservation planning; REDD+; tropical ecology assessment and monitoring network; wildlife conservation.
The conservation of tropical forest carbon stocks offers the opportunity to curb climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and simultaneously conserve biodiversity. However, there has been considerable debate about the extent to which carbon stock conservation will provide benefits to biodiversity in part because whether forests that contain high carbon density in their aboveground biomass also contain high animal diversity is unknown. Here, we empirically examined medium to large bodied ground-dwelling mammal and bird (hereafter “wildlife”) diversity and carbon stock levels within the tropics using camera trap and vegetation data from a pantropical network of sites. Specifically, we tested whether tropical forests that stored more carbon contained higher wildlife species richness, taxonomic diversity, and trait diversity. We found that carbon stocks were not a significant predictor for any of these three measures of diversity, which suggests that benefits for wildlife diversity will not be maximized unless wildlife diversity is explicitly taken into account; prioritizing carbon stocks alone will not necessarily meet biodiversity conservation goals. We recommend conservation planning that considers both objectives because there is the potential for more wildlife diversity and carbon stock conservation to be achieved for the same total budget if both objectives are pursued in tandem rather than independently. Tropical forests with low elevation variability and low tree density supported significantly higher wildlife diversity. These tropical forest characteristics may provide more affordable proxies of wildlife diversity for future multiobjective conservation planning when fine scale data on wildlife are lacking
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America
Beaudrot Lydia, Kroetz Kailin, Alvarez-Loayza Patricia, Amaral Ieda, Breuer Thomas, Fletcher Christine, Jansen Patrick A., Kenfack David, Moreira Lima Marcela Guimarães, Marshall Andrew R., Martin Emanuel H., Ndoundou-Hockemba Mireille, O’Brien Timothy, Razafimahaimodison Jean Claude, Romero-Saltos Hugo, Rovero Francesco, Roy Cisquet Hector, Sheil Douglas, Silva Carlos E.F., Spironello Wilson Roberto, Valencia Renato, Zvoleff Alex, Ahumada Jorge, Andelman Sandy
Ecological Society of America
Washington, EE.UU.
Inglés
Articulo de revista academica